Sept. 5, 2009 - toate postarile pe 200...

200 sacs de paquetage

05 septembrie 2009
Jocul Tory de "bagat la portbagaj" - Calgary 2007, Toronto 2009 - Nesimtiti, cum zicea Boc...
Can Harper play three chess games at once?
TheStar.com - Canada - Can Harper play three chess games at once?


FRANK GUNN/THE CANADIAN PRESS
Prime Minister Stephen Harper, left, and Justice Minister Rob Nicholson tour site of construction of a new conference centre in Niagara Falls on Sept. 3, 2009. September 04, 2009
Chantal Hébert


MONTREAL—It has been said that Stephen Harper is his own best strategist: a master tactician liable to be a few moves ahead of his opponents.

And in the past, the Prime Minister has often lived up to that reputation.

But how many chess games can he actually play at the same time? As of now, there are three simultaneous ones underway, each involving the ruling Conservatives and one of the opposition parties in the House of Commons.

On the first set, where the action has been for the best part of the year, the Liberals and the Conservatives have played themselves out. For the past nine months, Harper held the advantage, advancing his policies as he saw fit while the Liberals tried, in vain, to finesse their way out of a tight corner without risking too many big pieces.

This week Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff basically overturned the board and left the table. The next decisive play between him and Harper will take place in an election campaign.

Still, the Prime Minister figures he can score one last hit on Ignatieff before they carry their battle on to the next stage, by forcing the Liberals to bring the popular home renovation tax credit down with the government when the House returns in 10 days.

It may surprise many Canadians to find that a program they have been encouraged to spend significant amounts of money to qualify for has not yet been submitted to Parliament for approval.

It seems the Conservatives held it back for a moment such as this.

But if the Prime Minister wants to use the home renovation credit to embarrass Ignatieff, he will have to find a way around Gilles Duceppe.

Yesterday, the Bloc Québécois leader told Radio-Canada that if the government brings forward a supply motion to finance the home renovation program later this month, his party will support it.

Unless Harper loads a budget-related motion with other items that are unpalatable to the Bloc, the tax credit will sail through the Commons.

Jack Layton spent the past four years keeping a tab of every Liberal move that was supportive of the Conservatives. Only two weeks ago, he was quoting irreconcilable differences with Harper and arguing the NDP was the least likely to ever find common ground with the government. But yesterday he insisted there were moves that could actually bring the two so close that they could, together, keep Parliament going at least until the end of the year.

Since last fall's failed coalition attempt, Harper has made a virtue of not associating with Layton or Duceppe. Accusing the Liberals of catering to socialists and separatists to achieve power is part of this year's Conservative election playbook.

For his part, Layton has spent the past four years positioning his party as the only real opposition to the Conservatives. Since the last election, both he and Duceppe have systematically voted against the government on matters of confidence.

Given a choice, Harper sounds like he would rather see his government defeated than depend on the Bloc or the NDP for its survival. And Duceppe and Layton's core supporters really have zero tolerance for a prolonged cooperative spell between their parties and the Conservatives.

Notwithstanding the public assertions of the leaders, the current manoeuvres have more to do with establishing their respective places around the deathbed of the minority Parliament than with significantly extending its life.

Chantal Hébert is a national affairs writer. Her column appears Monday, Wednesday and Friday.

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/690854
----------------------------------------------------
It's political theatre season again
TheStar.com - Canada - It's political theatre season again

SETTING THE STAGE
With a fall election looming, politicians engaged in some campaign-style posturing

• Human Resources Minister Diane Finley blasted the Liberals for walking away from an EI working group.

• Liberal MP Bob Rae promised the home reno tax credit will be honoured even if the Conservative government falls.

• Bloc Québécois Leader Gilles Duceppe said he will support the government on a motion to implement the home renovation tax credit, if that's all it contains.

• NDP Leader Jack Layton said he wants concrete action on three key issues for his party to support the government – but added he doesn't think it's likely.
Props, posturing all part of run-up to possible election campaign

September 04, 2009
Tonda MacCharles
Joanna Smith
Ottawa Bureau

OTTAWA–Canadians are getting a sneak peek at an election campaign that hasn't yet started.

Players brought out props for a bit of political theatre yesterday: Human Resources Minister Diane Finley showed empty chairs to cameras to paint the Liberals as no-shows for a meeting on EI reform.

On other stages, there was political posturing.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper, in Niagara-on-the-Lake, declared he'd make "no backroom deals" to save his government. He painted his opponents as the same devilish dealmakers from last year's unpopular coalition again out to reverse the results of the past election. Yet he welcomed any "good, effective, affordable ideas" from his critics.

NDP Leader Jack Layton and Bloc Québécois Leader Gilles Duceppe have offered a political lifeline to Harper: their support on confidence votes if their demands are met.

Layton, at a news conference in Halifax, stressed the New Democrats would prefer action to an election: "The ball is entirely in Stephen Harper's court."

More than anything, however, there was a lot of political positioning. Just in case an election cannot be averted.

On the heels of Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff's threat to vote out the government as soon as possible, the parties have shifted into pre-election mode.

In the 308-seat House of Commons, the Conservatives hold 143 seats, the Liberals 77, the Bloc 48 and the NDP 36. (There is one independent MP and there are three vacancies.)

To trigger an election, all three opposition parties would have to vote to defeat the government.

The NDP and Bloc, who have long promised to overturn the government, are at pains to appear conciliatory, not combative, more interested in making Parliament work than they expressed in the past 10 months.

Layton said he wants to see "concrete action" on three key issues his party has pushed for this year – enhanced employment insurance benefits, pension protection and reduced credit card and ATM fees.

He would not specify what he would need from Harper in exchange for supporting his government through crucial votes in the coming weeks.

Duceppe let it be known he would support the government on an early ways-and-means motion to implement the budget's home renovation tax credit, if that's all it contains.

Liberal MP Bob Rae emerged to counter an early salvo of the Conservatives – that the home renovation tax credit would be killed if the government is defeated.

It's here to stay no matter who is in power when it is time to file tax returns next year, Rae told reporters: "Carry on painting. Carry on renovating. Those tax credits will be fully recognized."

Harper, continuing a week of spending announcements, cast himself as the only leader who cares a whit about the economy.

He announced new money for border crossings and bridges in the Sarnia and Niagara regions, insisting the bricks-and-mortar spending was more than just short-term job creation projects.

"It is more fundamentally about where we are headed as a country," Harper said. Upgraded infrastructure will "lay the groundwork for Canada's long-term future economic prosperity," he said, adding an election now could derail a fragile recovery.
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/690856
---------------------------
MacKay fined $200 over ethics breach
TheStar.com - Canada - MacKay fined $200 over ethics breach

September 04, 2009
HALIFAX–Canada's ethics commissioner fined Defence Minister Peter MacKay $200 yesterday for failing to disclose his involvement as a director and officer of two companies owned by his father.

MacKay resigned from Beaver Lumber Co. Ltd. and Lorne Resources Co. Ltd. this week after the commissioner contacted him.

The Conflict of Interest Act forbids cabinet ministers from serving as officers in corporations.

MacKay said the mistake was inadvertent.

"There's no formal role that I ever played, and so I simply forgot essentially that my name was still showing on the roll," he said. "I'm sorry about this oversight."

The Canadian Press

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/690875
----------------------------------
Bernier papers contained 'crucial intelligence'
TheStar.com - Canada - Bernier papers contained 'crucial intelligence'

Documents left at former girlfriend's house full of sensitive information, Quebec newspaper says

September 04, 2009
Allan Woods
Ottawa Bureau

OTTAWA–Maxime Bernier may be gone from the federal cabinet, but the controversy that ousted him from the lofty foreign affairs post a year ago is not forgotten.

Weeks of political nightmare for Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government in 2008 were resurrected yesterday with accusations in the Quebec newspaper Le Devoir that the secret documents he mistakenly left at a former girlfriend's apartment contained "crucial intelligence for (Canada's) enemies."

The 560 pages of material to prepare Bernier for the April, 2008 NATO summit included Canada's stance on the treatment of Taliban prisoners in Afghanistan, missile defence, the presence of Al Qaeda in Pakistan, Iran's nuclear ambitions, the Dalai Lama and arms control in the Middle East.

It was, noted Le Devoir, a treasure trove of sensitive information that included details of what Bernier planned to discuss with his foreign counterparts. Much of the material, obtained under the Access to Information Act, was blacked out by government censors.

Bernier resigned on May 26, 2008 after Julie Couillard returned the material to the federal government. The Montreal real estate agent had been married to and dated men connected to Quebec's biker gangs.

Bernier condemned the article yesterday. "The journalist grounds his assertion not on the nature of the information itself – which he has not seen – but on the fact that the word `Secret' is marked on sections of the documents ... and the fact that paragraphs were taken out by civil servants before he obtained the document, which was totally predictable since we're talking about secret documents," he wrote on his personal website.
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/690885
---------------------------
Publicat de Mihai Bulacu la 12:23 0 comentarii
Probabil din cover-up-ul Canadian-UK-USA nu pot intra in presa...
Curios, nu am reusit sa intru in presa scrisa. Cred ca totul este in linia cover-up-ului contractat de romani pentru canadieni. Daca as avea statut de ziarist, as avea ceva protectie.
Fiind insa tinut ca marginal, expediabil ca si fotograf sau cine mai stie ce curier, scenariul Tory canadian & Labour UK (MI6), sunt usor de minimalizat, iar in paralel mi se sterg diplomele, mi se schimba numele, in curand sunt declarat si tzigan... Cum permite totusi SRI-ul roman unor tradatori de tzara sa faca astfel de jocuri??? Doar toti respectivii sunt ofiteri de informatii, chiar daca acoperiti? Este o problema de contra-informatii, si in principiu, este contra interesului national, si impotriva jocului european...
Publicat de Mihai Bulacu la 12:18 0 comentarii
O mana spala pe alta, si amandoua te baga in portbagaj - in Toronto...

The making of a homegrown terrorist
TheStar.com - GTA - The making of a homegrown terrorist


ALEX TAVSHUNSKY FOR THE TORONTO STAR
Saad Khalid, 23, seen in a sketch in Brampton court on Sept. 3, 2009. How Saad Khalid went from carefree child to radical teen to young adult who's been handed a 14-year jail term in Toronto 18 plot

September 04, 2009
Isabel Teotonio
Staff reporter

Saad Khalid was only 16 when he was dealt a devastating blow.

He returned home to find paramedics trying to revive his mother, who had been found submerged in the bathtub. He sank to his knees in despair and buried his face in his hands. She was gone.

The once-gregarious teen became reticent. He withdrew from sports, tended to his younger siblings and took on more household chores.

He and his brothers and sisters were discouraged from speaking about his mother's struggles with depression and her death. Instead, they were told to pray to God.

Khalid, whose family was Muslim but not overly religious, found comfort in Islam. At his Mississauga high school, he started hanging around Muslim students with extremist views, denouncing the West and leading impassioned sermons about jihad and martyrdom.

Reflecting on those years, Khalid would later tell a psychiatrist that he had developed a "connection toward the Muslim cause" and an "increased sense of meaning." He believed he was "here for a purpose." By age 19, he felt a religious obligation to do something to change Western policies that he believed were hurting Muslims.

Yesterday, Khalid, now 23, was sentenced to 14 years for his role in a homegrown terror cell known as the Toronto 18, which was busted in June 2006 for plotting to detonate truck bombs in downtown Toronto.

But he was given credit for his three years and three months spent in pre-trial custody, meaning his sentence amounts to an additional seven years behind bars. He will be eligible for parole in 28 months. Khalid was ordered to provide a DNA sample and was given a lifetime weapons prohibition.

In May, he pleaded guilty to intending to cause an explosion that was likely to cause serious bodily harm, death or damage to property. He was the first member of the group to admit the existence of a bomb plot.

His sentence will surely influence some of his co-accused, who are also considering guilty pleas.

Superior Court Justice Bruce Durno told a Brampton court yesterday he had been persuaded Khalid did not know all the details of the chilling plot and that he had expressed regret for his involvement.

While reading from the 48-page ruling, the judge also noted Khalid "was vulnerable after the death of his mother and recruited by more devoted extremists."

"(Khalid's) need to emulate powerful and influential leaders, combined with his youthful naivete, were evident and likely played a role in his behaviour," said Durno.

Khalid was arrested while unloading three tonnes of ammonium nitrate fertilizer intended to blow up the Toronto Stock Exchange, the Front St. offices of Canada's spy agency and a military base off Highway 401. The plot was foiled with the help of undercover police agent Shaher Elsohemy, who set up a sting operation that resulted in the arrests of 14 adults and four youths.

The story of how Khalid went from being a carefree child to convicted terrorist emerges, in part, from Star interviews with former schoolmates and court documents, including a psychiatric report and about 30 letters from Khalid's family and friends to the judge.

Khalid was born in Saudi Arabia to Pakistani parents and is the middle of five children. The family moved to Canada in 1995, when he was 9.

By all accounts, he was an average kid, raised by supportive parents. He loved cartoons, video games and playing sports, especially soccer and cricket.

By Grade 9, he wanted in with the cool crowd, he told forensic psychiatrist Dr. Lisa Ramshaw during a risk assessment that consisted of two interviews done in the spring.

Initially, he didn't have many Muslim friends, preferring to hang with the "cool black guys," who were popular with girls, and he began skipping class and getting into fights. But even during those early years in high school, Khalid respected his teachers and never disobeyed his parents.

His mother's death marked a turning point for him, family members say.

"(Khalid) was at a stage in his life when he was preparing to achieve a lot of good things," wrote his father, Khalid Syed, who works in information technology. "The untimely loss of his mother came as a great shock and disrupted his life."

One of Khalid's uncles said the loss "skewed (Khalid's) psychological state of mind in a manner that we failed to identify" and that the "psychological trauma" led to his involvement with the group.

His family didn't realize he had an increasing preoccupation with the Muslim cause.

But at Meadowvale Secondary School there was no mistaking it. He made new Muslim friends, including the alleged mastermind of the bomb plot, started praying five times a day, and began leading sermons that made him popular.

He criticized western policies and Canada's role in Afghanistan, turning sermons into vitriolic diatribes about how the West was the enemy.

A former student who attended sermons led by Khalid and a co-accused told the Star he remembered being pressed about what he planned to do for his Muslim brothers overseas.

"They spoke about martyrdom at the sermon, how martyrs would go straight to heaven," said the young man, who asked not to be identified.

By the time Khalid started at the University of Toronto, where he studied business management, he felt obliged to do something. Months later, in December 2005, he and other members of the Toronto 18 attended a terrorist training camp, held in Washago, Ont. The bomb plot began to take form in March 2006.

During his interviews with Ramshaw, he denied any change in his religious convictions or political beliefs, but said he now realized there were other ways to effect change.

There was "no tangible benefit from fighting," he said, adding that he would like to channel his energy and "do more grassroots work."
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/690877

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Cam asta ar fi scenariul de lucru, pe care Furtuna-Berceanu au lucrat in Romania, cu sprijinul unor factiuni din SRI si Politie. Cu astfel de "story" s-au lichidat niste persoane, cu asta s-au lucrat ceva diagnostice medicale, cu meniul asta se arunca e-mail-uri cu diverse boli... Miron, fratele meu, tot spunea ceva despre rasism, dupa convocarile bi-saptamanale in anturajul cms. Bica (agent ATF sau FBI pe Oltenia)
----------------------------

Let the courts judge hate crime
TheStar.com - Opinion - Let the courts judge hate crime

September 04, 2009
The Canadian Criminal Code is tough on hate-mongers, and rightly so. It provides for up to two years in jail for wilfully promoting hatred against identifiable groups. That's a major deterrent to racists, homophobes and other purveyors of hate in the media or anywhere else.

Given this safeguard, it's hard to see why the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) should also be empowered to impose fines of up to $10,000 and award damages of up to $20,000 for much the same offence, under a controversial section of the human rights act that prohibits telecommunicating "any matter that is likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt."

Critics of Section 13(1), including the Star, regard it as an unwarranted chill on our Charter right to freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression that imperils spirited public discourse.

Now, surprisingly, a member of the CHRC tribunal agrees.

In a bombshell ruling this week, Athanasios Hadjis flatly challenged Section 13's constitutionality. He found that a Canadian with neo-Nazi ties ran afoul of the rights act by posting an anti-gay message on his website. But Hadjis also found Section 13 to be unlawful because it is more than a "minimal" infringement on freedom of expression.

That contradicts a 1990 Supreme Court ruling that upheld Section 13. But Hadjis argues that back in 1990 the CHRC could only issue a "cease and desist" order, not impose punitive fines. That changed in 1998. "The potential `chill' upon free expression may have consequently increased," he reasons.

This ruling strengthens the case for Parliament to get the CHRC out of the business of policing hate speech by repealing Section 13 and leaving the problem of hate speech to the criminal courts.

Section 13 isn't salvageable. It can be interpreted to cover stereotyping and defaming, as well as hate-mongering. There's no need to prove intent. The tribunal can accept evidence that wouldn't stand up in court. And it doesn't have to establish guilt beyond doubt. It's that bad.

Even the CHRC now agrees that Parliament must more clearly define what constitutes hatred and that the CHRC should lose the power to fine. Yet it wants to continue sitting in judgment on these issues.

Why? An open, democratic society should impose as few restrictions as possible on free speech. Hate crimes should be handled by the courts, not by lesser tribunals.

---------------------------------------
La un moment dat, dr. Cornel Boiangiu facea provocari de genul asta in Romania, in Craiova. Curios, fratele meu a aparat jocul asta, banuiesc sub un santaj Bica-Furtuna... Cu ce il joaca pe micul negustor de unelte pentru lemn, self-employed? Cand i-am spus sa co-semneze plangere CEDO, nu a vrut... De ce oare? Cine este cel care il "butoneaza" pe Miron?
---------------------------------------
How free should hate speech be?
TheStar.com - Opinion - How free should hate speech be?

September 04, 2009
Amy Gutmann
President of the University of Pennsylvania

Freedom of speech is the lifeblood of all constitutional democracies. Without it, democracy readily becomes tyranny of the majority or – even more likely – of the most politically powerful minority. Yet freedom of speech also has limits.

Political scientists from Canada and the United States are meeting in Toronto for the annual convention of the American Political Science Association (APSA) this weekend. In response to a petition we received earlier this year – on whether Canadian law on "hate speech" and Human Rights Commissions posed a threat to freedom of speech and academic freedom – we are debating the question from perspectives on both sides of the issue, and both sides of the border.

Although Canada and the United States are close-knit constitutional democracies, their limits on free speech differ, especially in the treatment of hate speech. Both provide broad protections of free speech, but the Criminal Code of Canada includes legal penalties against "the wilful promotion of hatred" while U.S. law does not. While meeting in Toronto and pursuing the free exchange of ideas about democratic politics, we thought it fitting to wrestle anew with the question: How free should hate speech be? Comments by professors Keith Whittington, Carissima Mathen, Jeremy Waldron and Robert Post follow:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We are rightfully wary of using governments to regulate speech. It is one possible response, the last available response, and often a response that brings its own share of problems. Legal regulation is often motivated by the extreme case, the obvious case. But once the regulation is in place, it will not be easily limited to the extreme case.

Not long after the adoption of the U.S. Constitution, Congress passed the first federal sedition law, making it a crime to cause "hatred" against the government. In response, the critics of the government, led by Thomas Jefferson, developed new ideas about the role of free speech in a democracy. As they pointed out, and frequently found out, government prosecutors and partisan juries were all too willing to believe that expressing an unpopular opinion in strong terms about the incumbent president was not robust political speech but rather illegitimate hate speech.

–Keith E. Whittington, William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Politics, Princeton University.

Hate speech makes most people recoil, yet in choosing to deal with it through the criminal law we run the risks of being both over-inclusive and ineffective. It can be exceptionally difficult to decide whether a particular expression embodies "hate" as opposed to other strong emotions, such as passion or anger, that have a legitimate place in public debate. In a society marked by diverse groups with different conceptions of the good, we should be especially wary that such laws will be used against those who hold odd or unorthodox beliefs, or are simply slower to accept new social norms. Canada criminalizes hate speech on the basis that it contributes nothing to our society and harms the groups that it targets. If the harm can be addressed through non-criminal means, then resorting to the criminal law is inappropriate. Procedural safeguards do not mitigate the risks posed by a vague and indeterminate law. There is a place for intervention to deal with material that actively subverts rather than enhances public policy, a threshold that our society is entitled to determine. But such intervention ought to be primarily directed at the materials, not the speaker. In the absence of a specific risk of violence or advocacy of unlawful behaviour, hate speech should not be criminalized.

–Carissima Mathen, Professor of Law, University of New Brunswick

Certainly, racist hate speech should be restricted in some circumstances. The publications we call hate speech are often intended to do two things: (1) to defame and attack the dignity, honour and social standing of minorities and their members; and (2) to undermine the assurance that any good society is trying to give to its most vulnerable citizens that they and their families can go about their lives with some basic security against humiliation, discrimination and violence. Perhaps a society with no history of racial, ethnic or religious tension can afford to ignore this. But in the real world, such expressions of hate function as reminders that what has happened in the past might happen again – reminders that are heard differently by members of vulnerable minorities than by members of the secure majority. Dignity and assurance for all are fragile and vulnerable achievements, and well-drafted laws against hate speech, if they are administered carefully through the courts by an attorney general (or by prosecutors who bear proper responsibility for preserving public order), can play an important role in upholding them.

–Jeremy Waldron, University Professor, NYU Law School

All societies regulate uncivil speech regarded as inconsistent with the prerequisites of social solidarity. One question is who is authorized to define such speech. Countries with strong, coherent elites, like Iran or Saudi Arabia, unilaterally define uncivil speech in terms of the ideology of these elites. Self-consciously multicultural societies, like Canada, India or Australia, must also rely on powerful centralized elites to define the rules by which diverse groups shall be permitted to deal with each other. In societies like the United States, in which such elites are weak or fractured, authority to define uncivil speech is correspondingly reduced. A second important variable in the comparative regulation of hate speech is the need for free and undisciplined participation in public discourse in order to secure democratic legitimation among heterogeneous populations. The stronger this need, the more the regulation of hate speech will be reduced. Finally, some states affirm social solidarity based upon the "levelling up" of all citizens to the norms of honour previously associated with aristocratic elites, whereas other societies, like the United States, affirm social solidarity based upon a "levelling down" to mass proletariat manners. The regulation of hate speech is much less urgent in the later circumstances.

–Robert Post, Dean and Sol & Lillian Goldman Professor of Law, The Yale Law School

http://www.thestar.com/article/690762
------------------------------------
Cred ca totusi sociologia si profilul etnic al clasei politice din Romania recenta ar putea face subiectul unor studii baietilor de la Yale Law School, dar in sincron cu ceva devalizari bancare, scheme Ponzi si deturnari de taxe si impozite... Vezi Sect. 5 Bucuresti, si Dolj...
-------------------------
Out-of-province judge may be needed for Bryant case
04 September 2009 05:25

TORONTO - The sudden twist of fate that left Michael Bryant facing criminal charges in the death of a bicycle courier has also thrust Ontario into a legal quandary: How do you put a former attorney general on trial?

Bryant, who once appointed judges and oversaw Crown prosecutors, has suddenly found himself on the opposite side of the judicial system, accused of criminal negligence causing death and dangerous operation of a vehicle causing death.

The Ministry of the Attorney General, which administers justice in the province, is treading carefully to avoid any whiff of political interference.

It's hired top Vancouver criminal lawyer Richard Peck to prosecute the case and isolated the bureaucrats who are overseeing the process from Bryant's former Liberal colleagues, like current Attorney General Chris Bentley.

One expert predicts an out-of-province judge will also be recruited to preside over Bryant's case, which made headlines across the country.

"No one for a minute would suggest that a provincial court judge would actually be biased in his favour," said Toronto defence lawyer Jonathan Rosenthal.

"But it certainly would have the apprehension that she would be biased, that she would not be independent, and that's why they'll bring in a judge from another province."

The choice of judge ultimately lies with Chief Justice Annemarie Bonkalo of the Ontario Court of Justice, who was appointed by Bryant in 2007.

He also appointed associate chief justices Peter Griffiths and John Payne.

Sylvia Gudzowski, Bonkalo's assistant, said the matter is "currently under consideration," but declined further comment.

The high-profile case has already raised questions about whether Bryant - who was released from police custody Tuesday without appearing before a judge - received preferential treatment.

After spending the night in police custody, a clean-shaven Bryant emerged to face the cameras dressed in a dark suit that had been delivered to the station.

But it would have been "almost impossible" to get a timely bail hearing for Bryant, which would have required an out-of-province judge and a prosecutor to avoid any potential conflict of interest, said Rosenthal.

"I wouldn't say it was preferential treatment, I would say it's different treatment," he said.

"Let's face it, it's probably the first time that the police ever arrested the attorney general from the province."

Bryant is to make his first court appearance on Oct. 19.

Different and sometimes conflicting accounts of the events leading up to the fatal encounter Monday night have emerged in the aftermath of Bryant's arrest.

Police say bike courier Darcy Allan Sheppard, 33, grabbed onto a car in Toronto's tony Yorkville district following an altercation with the driver.

The driver drove away with Sheppard hanging on. He then fell and suffered fatal injuries, police said.

According to sources, Bryant was driving home that night from an anniversary dinner with his wife, Susan Abramovitch.

Later that night, Bryant was photographed sitting in the back of a police cruiser. He was taken into custody by police and released the next day after the charges were laid.

Sheppard's girlfriend, Misty Bailey, said he was drunk when he showed up at her door earlier that night and that police refused to take Sheppard home.

But police, who say they were called to the apartment just minutes before his death and escorted him out, said Sheppard showed no signs of intoxication.

Sgt. Tim Burrows said police are investigating every angle, including the possibility that Sheppard may have grabbed the steering wheel of the car.

"We're looking at everything," he said.

There's a lot at stake for Bryant, 43, a Harvard-educated lawyer who was considered by many to have the right stuff for a run at the premier's job.

Criminal negligence causing death carries a maximum sentence of life in prison, while dangerous operation of a motor vehicle causing death carries a maximum 14-year term.

If convicted, Bryant could also face disciplinary action from the Law Society of Upper Canada.

Bryant, who spent 10 years at the provincial legislature before announcing he would step down in May, has maintained his innocence.

He hired Marie Henein, who worked with top defence lawyer Edward Greenspan, as his legal counsel Thursday. Henein defended former hockey coach David Frost, who was found not guilty of sexual exploitation last November.

Bryant has also retained the services of Toronto public-relations firm Navigator Ltd., which former prime minister Brian Mulroney employed during the Oliphant inquiry.

Law professor Douglas Sanderson, who worked as a senior policy adviser to Bryant between 2004 and 2008, said he hasn't talked to the former cabinet minister since the incident.

He described Bryant, a fellow Fulbright scholar, as an exceptional attorney general who tackled many lesser-known projects, such as human rights reform, as well as the headline-grabbers like his public crusade to ban pit bulls.

But Sanderson urged patience and caution for those gripped by the story and media frenzy surrounding the case.

"It's a tragedy by any standard," he said.

"New details are emerging daily and I think everyone should hold off judgment until we get a full set of facts."

THE CANADIAN PRESS
----------------------------
Din ce constat, acum sunt "imprumutat" americanilor de la Boeing in jocul lor si presiunile lor contra Airbus, in procesul WTO... Curata sclavie moderna, iar eu urma sa stau in trailer, ca si suspect de terorism sau agresor conjugal, "compunerea" gastii Furtuna-Berceanu et al.... Thanks, Canada! Tot tu mi-ai sters si diplomele, dischetele cu raportul GPS diferential, tot tu ai acoperit destule... Acum vrei sa dai doua blide de mancare!
Publicat de Mihai Bulacu la 11:56 0 comentarii
Cred ca Maxime Bernier, fostul Ministru de Externe canadian stie mai multe despre depozitiile mele de anul trecut
Bernier papers contained 'crucial intelligence'
TheStar.com - Canada - Bernier papers contained 'crucial intelligence'

Documents left at former girlfriend's house full of sensitive information, Quebec newspaper says

September 04, 2009
Allan Woods
Ottawa Bureau

OTTAWA–Maxime Bernier may be gone from the federal cabinet, but the controversy that ousted him from the lofty foreign affairs post a year ago is not forgotten.

Weeks of political nightmare for Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government in 2008 were resurrected yesterday with accusations in the Quebec newspaper Le Devoir that the secret documents he mistakenly left at a former girlfriend's apartment contained "crucial intelligence for (Canada's) enemies."

The 560 pages of material to prepare Bernier for the April, 2008 NATO summit included Canada's stance on the treatment of Taliban prisoners in Afghanistan, missile defence, the presence of Al Qaeda in Pakistan, Iran's nuclear ambitions, the Dalai Lama and arms control in the Middle East.

It was, noted Le Devoir, a treasure trove of sensitive information that included details of what Bernier planned to discuss with his foreign counterparts. Much of the material, obtained under the Access to Information Act, was blacked out by government censors.

Bernier resigned on May 26, 2008 after Julie Couillard returned the material to the federal government. The Montreal real estate agent had been married to and dated men connected to Quebec's biker gangs.

Bernier condemned the article yesterday. "The journalist grounds his assertion not on the nature of the information itself – which he has not seen – but on the fact that the word `Secret' is marked on sections of the documents ... and the fact that paragraphs were taken out by civil servants before he obtained the document, which was totally predictable since we're talking about secret documents," he wrote on his personal website.

http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/690885

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$4

Sunt convins ca Maxime Bernier si fostul director francofon al CSIS s-au ocupat de situatia Madrid 3/11, de fapt fuck-up-ul de atunci, si ei au fost "uneltele" de lichidare sau neutralizare a mea, dupa Calgary 2007. Cred ca ei stiu mai multe cum se organizeaza niste "jocuri" tip McDonalds in Elvetia, cum se face promotie CocaCola... Cred ca situatia Bob Quick si Jaqui Smith din UK corelata cu jocul lor din primavara 2008. Imi amintesc chiar de sugestiile de arta stradala, pentru poeti, facute in inter-city-ul spre Strassbourg. Cred ca sunt in spiritul pur al lui Richard Florida, si al left-ismului canadian, sau cel putin al cover-up-ului Madrid...
Publicat de Mihai Bulacu la 11:50 0 comentarii
Adevaratul "deal" canadian - aviz si altor amatori...

http://www.thestar.com/article/689584

The real deal and he can cook

MICHAEL STUPARYK / TORONTO STAR
Chef Matty Matheson shows off some of the cuisine that has drawn diners to Oddfellows. Or charter this Winnebago and he’ll serve you canapés. Email story
Print
Choose text size
Report error or complaint
Taco Hell


To celebrate tomorrow's one-year anniversary of its opening, Oddfellows restaurant, 936 Queen St. W., is putting a special twist on its regular Taco Hell party, held every Sunday. Besides the usual all-you-can eat tacos (pork, fish, venison, chorizo, veggie) and fixings for $15, chef Matty Matheson and co-owner Brian Richer will act as deejays.

It all starts at 8 p.m.
Fiercely dedicated chef collects a following as he goes his own way

Sep 05, 2009 04:30 AM
Ivy Knight
Special to the star

------------------------
Sper ca SRI-ul roman sa se ocupe cu adevarat de contra-informatii in interesul european, si poate explica de ce unii au devenit urgent pensionabili in 2005, poate ca erau agenti ostili UE, mai ales persoane din justitia romana.
Partenerii lor din Toronto, sau de cine stie incearca presiunile prin Toronto. Asteptam o executie gen Gerrard Bull, impuscat in Bruxelles? Sau se lucreaza cu droguri si chimicale?

Ma gandesc ca poate se mai "compun" ceva teroristi, si dupa un nou Madrid, se rezolva si grupul ALDE, liberalii europeni... Cum au fost rezolvati si Crestin-Democratii, dupa Madrid 3/11.
Publicat de Mihai Bulacu la 11:44 0 comentarii
04 septembrie 2009
Sclavie moderna, in Canada - vai de mama ei de drepturile omului pe aici...


Se pare ca la paritate cu Ciprian Nastasiu, asa-zisul procuror independent, dar se pare ofiter de informatii care l-a anchetat pe Omar Hayssam, a cazut in Canada Michael Bryant, fost procuror sef in Ontario, ceva in genul asta, baiat in politica, viitor politician Tory. Cred ca echipa din Toronto, implicata in acoperirea jocurilor cu actele mele, date se pare colegului si prietenului Simonei Furtuna, Iulius Nistor, au fost sau au preluat Tory din Ontario, nu prea inteleg de ce totusi... Probabil prin Iulius s-au negociat sau platit ceva comisioane - poate s-a exportat si de la SNC Lavalin, urmare fiind ca directorul francofon al CSIS si-a dat demisia, ca acoperire...
Curios, s-au cumparat din Quebec codurile de procedura penala si civila, poate la "facilitarea" fostului meu socru, jud. Ctin. Furtuna, si prin Catalin Predoiu, var indepartat al lui Silviu Predoiu, directorul adj. SIE. Sa fie cei trei "un aspect" al comunitatii de informatii rrome, de care face atat caz Corneliu Vadim Tudor? Poate ca din cauza asta este greu de inregistrat chiar in Canada divortul meu, poate ca din cauza asta imi tot sunt "vanturate" si fluturate intimidari, sugestii de trecere in aborigen, de persoana cu dizabilitati, poate ca asa s-au fabricat acuzatii de siguranta nationala, de agresiune conjugala...
Canada isi bate joc de cetateni, a inceput sa fie o frauda, si urgent este de plecat din jocul lor de "cover-up".
Cred ca actele mele pentru Nistor au fost gestionate de Furtuna-Berceanu, si au participat oarecum la afacerile Tigareta I-IV. Nu inteleg de unde apare legatura cu Hong Kong-ul, dar este posibil ca jud. Furtuna sa fi facut protectia informativa si pentru dosarele Nastase, cu conexiunile lor chinezesti....
Din pacate, m-au prins la mijloc, m-au fabricat drept un "terorist" si sunt folosit pe post de momeala vie, live-bait, ca si alti detinuti Guantanamo, gen Maher Arar. Sunt lipsit de acces juridic, iar in rest, imi sunt aruncate pe toate ziarele gratis sugestii de HIV-SIDA. Posibil ca gen. Gordon Diamond, probabil initiatorul furtului de acte al meu, este cel care a pus la cale jocul. Sunt nevoit sa numar cel putin 3 politicieni tineri, care au iesit din joc, din cauza situatiei Bulacu-Nistor...
Initial am crezut ca Miron, fratele meu este folosit drept inlocuitor al meu, dar constat ca nu. Am crezut la un moment dat ca Valentin ?Lance?, actualul sot-prieten al fostei sotii este inlocuitorul meu, iar gasca SPP-SIE-PSD din jurul dr. Oprescu, fiul unui gen. DSS incearca sa rezolve cumva o izolare-detentie a mea, sub diverse pretexte sau mijloace, doar ca sa acopere un "rahat" major al gastii Iliescu, si "bavuri" ale serviciilor de informatii NATO, gen Madrid 3/11.
Aparent, prin jocul asta, se urmareste destabilizarea UE pentru SUA, ca o operatiune de informatii Foreign Flag, desfasurata de Canada-Israel-Romania. Aparent din cauza asta a ajuns echipa de ziaristi din Iraq in portbagaj, iar aici, in Toronto, se urmareste exact un "portbagaj" pentru mine. Cum au ajuns oare romanii sa faca jocurile astea de destabilizare pentru altii, ei fiind cei care vor lua rahatul, nu pot intelege. Cert este ca in acest moment, Canada nu mai este deloc ceea ce a fost, este o tara relativ periculoasa pentru intimitate, pentru cariera, ne-prielnica... Imi pare rau sa o spun, poate ca eu am de-a face de fapt doar cu un regim "micro" al CIA in Toronto, nu stiu precis. Poate ca este exact aceeasi situatie ca in Craiova, unde sub pretextul Ford se trag tunuri si se fac jocuri informative...
Este foarte posibil ca "account-ul" Mihai Bulacu sa fi fost cumva in portofoliul firmei IMP, din Halifax, de unde, coincidenta, actualul ministru canadian al apararii, Peter MacKay este. La Bombardier DSD l-am avut coleg pe fiul unui alt col. de la IMP, si poate ca nu a fost o coincidenta, ci era deja in contul "acte pentru Iulius Nistor, Chris Koening.
Sa fi facut canadienii Madrid 3/11, sa fi fost atat de nebuni incat sa marseze pe astfel de cretinisme?

In jocul asta, in Canada au incercat sa ma bage pe scenariul col. KGB-FSB Mihail Lenninkov, un individ care urmeaza sa fie deportat din Vancouver. Este o cacanarie canadiana ieftina, genul celei facute la Calgary, la Staples. Atunci au inceput cover-up-ul pentru Nistor-Madrid 3/11, pregatind lichidarea mea. Coincidenta, atunci a murit si Oprica Mateescu de o hemoragie gastrica, ca o intimidare generala, aviz amatorilor. Parca am mai auzit si despre ceva canceruri prin mediul politic, in Romania si Canada, dupa august 2007... Probabil exercitiile militare din Marea Neagra NATO din sept. 2007 au fost "umbrela" de lichidari, eliminari si intimidarea martorilor asupra Madrid 3/11 si actele Bulacu pt. Iulius Nistor...
Ma intreb daca intre jud. Furtuna, av. Victor Ciobanu si Adrian Goldenberg, operator de taxi la New York, confectioner de lenjerie in lohn in Romania exista vre-o legatura, sau este vorba doar despre o mica "coada" a WTC 9/11 2001. Grig Carstea, fostul meu coleg de facultate a fost in NY exact in 9/11 2001, iar Motorola shell al lui de atunci, l-am avut pentru o perioada si eu... Sa fie o coincidenta, sau este o operatiune informativa? In ce echipa e Furtuna? Victor Ciobanu este ofiter de informatii DSS, acum avocat...
Jud. Furtuna face un joc interesant, el pe stanga, iar cuscrul lui, Harzoiu, pe dreapta. Nu stiu daca Radu Berceanu este jucat de Furtuna sau de Harzoiu... Curios este insa jocul UK, de a ma impinge si neutraliza in sistemul de "Sifon" informativ, sau de security, minimalizare. Incep sa cred ca Nistor este implicat in comisioane UK, din moment ce sunt impins in jocuri englezesti. Poate ca asa as disparea mai usor din joc, as fi tinut la lichidare, cum sunt in Canada - fara suport juridic, lucrand 2 1/2 zile pe sapt., munca complet necalificata... Aviz amatorilor de emigrare in Toronto - nu sunt marfa serioasa astia de pe aici...

Curios, coincidenta, se pare ca Furtuna si gasca lui, ca in Moartea Dlui Lazarescu, ma foloseste ca pe un copil la cersit, un fel de martor si de carte de inchiriat, in diverse procese... Probabil gasca lui ia bani pentru prezenta mea in anumite jurisdictii juridice.

Curios, coincidenta, se pare ca Furtuna si gasca lui, ca in Moartea Dlui Lazarescu, ma foloseste ca pe un copil la cersit, un fel de martor si de carte de joc de inchiriat, in diverse procese... Probabil gasca lui ia bani pentru prezenta mea in anumite jurisdictii juridice. Cred probabil ca
sunt carte de presiune in anumite procese in derulare, desi nu am datele necesare:
Proces Pfizer - 2.3Bln. $
Proces Microsoft - anti-trust
Airbus deal - vs. USA (WTA)
deci sunt pe post de sclav la niste proxeneti de cea mai joasa factura... Urmasii operatorilor de sclavi din sec. 18-19...
Cred ca trebuie sa intru intr-o jurisdictie mai morala, nu atat de duplicitara, cum sunt anglo-saxonii. Parca nemtii, italienii si elvetienii nu au fost traficanti de sclavi si de droguri, ca englezii, si Commonwealth-ul lor.... Vai de mama ei de ipocrizie canadiana si engleza. Americanii macar au un presedinte de culoare, care accepta ca stare de fapt coruptia si disfunctionalitatea din Romania, si mai si profita...
Publicat de Mihai Bulacu la 11:15 0 comentarii
03 septembrie 2009
Pasul urmator in intimdari, Burn Mothefucker, burn, cu taserul in aeroport...



Acces la justitie, pauza, discriminari si provocari, da... Diplomele sterse, ceva trimiteri la munca de jos....
Buna coordonarea asta pe aici...
Si cred ca pana la urma cel care mi-a folosit actele, probabil sub protectia informativa a fostului socru, jud. Ctin. Furtuna, a fiicei lui, fosta mea sotie care nu vrea sa accepte prea usor divortul, Simona Furtuna, notar public, si cu concursul politistilor din Craiova, gen. col. Sandu, fostul sef 0215, cms. Bica, rectorul de la Drept Spiru Haret si a altilor, este Iulius Nistor, fratele unui ofiter de informatii militare, si probabil si el un acoperit in SPP...
ulius Nistor Iulius is your connection (1st degree)

Developing new businesses, start ups

Location
Romania
Industry
Management Consulting

Current

* Owner at Nutrisana
* Sales and Marketing Manager at PayUp Romania SA
* Owner at Sefario Consulting

Past

* Sales Director at Parmalat Romania SA
* Sales Manager at Heinrig Impex SRL
* National Sales Manager at BDG Imprest SRL

* Deputy Area Manager/Key Account Manager at INTERBREW ROMANIA

see less...

see all...
Education

* Landmark
* CODECS
* Universitatea din Craiova

Recommendations

2 people have recommended Iulius
Connections

158 connections
Websites

* My Company
* My Company
* My Company

Public Profile

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/iulius-nistor/2/117/a62

Experience
Owner
Nutrisana

Health, Wellness and Fitness industry

October 2008 – Present (1 year)

Cobilitza.ro - bacanie, manufactura, arta.

Recommend Iulius’s work at Nutrisana
Sales and Marketing Manager
PayUp Romania SA

Financial Services industry

May 2007 – Present (2 years 5 months)

electronic payments

Recommend Iulius’s work at PayUp Romania SA
Owner
Sefario Consulting

Management Consulting industry

September 2002 – Present (7 years 1 month)

Management, Consultancy, Training in Business, Sales and Marketing, Communication

Iulius has 1 recommendation (1 client) including:

* Liliana Ceausescu

Recommend Iulius’s work at Sefario Consulting
Sales Director
Parmalat Romania SA

Privately Held; 51-200 employees; Food & Beverages industry

February 2006 – March 2007 (1 year 2 months)

Recommend Iulius’s work at Parmalat Romania SA
Sales Manager
Heinrig Impex SRL

Privately Held; 51-200 employees; Food & Beverages industry

March 2003 – February 2006 (3 years)

Recommend Iulius’s work at Heinrig Impex SRL
National Sales Manager
BDG Imprest SRL

Privately Held; 51-200 employees; Food & Beverages industry

February 2000 – February 2003 (3 years 1 month)

Iulius has 1 recommendation (1 manager) including:

* Liviu Souca, General Manager, BDG (red bull, corona, budweiser, evian) distribution

Recommend Iulius’s work at BDG Imprest SRL
Deputy Area Manager/Key Account Manager
INTERBREW ROMANIA

Public Company; 10,001 or more employees; Food & Beverages industry

August 1996 – February 2000 (3 years 7 months)

Recommend Iulius’s work at INTERBREW ROMANIA
Education
Landmark
,

2004 – 2004

Recommend Iulius’s work at Landmark
CODECS
Professional Certificate in Management, Management

1999 – 2000

Recommend Iulius’s work at CODECS
Universitatea din Craiova
Engineer, Electromechanical

1989 – 1995

Recommend Iulius’s work at Universitatea din Craiova
Recommendations For Iulius
Owner
Sefario Consulting

“Result oriented. Self starter mentality. Good managing and people-interaction skills.” April 23, 2007

Top qualities: Good Value, High Integrity, Creative

Liliana Ceausescu
hired Iulius as a Business Consultant in 2000, and hired Iulius more than once
National Sales Manager
BDG Imprest SRL

“Besides being a joy to work with, Iulius is able to present creative ideas and communicate the benefits. He has successfully developed several sales&marketing plans for our company that have resulted in increased revenue.” April 2, 2009

Liviu Souca, General Manager, BDG (red bull, corona, budweiser, evian) distribution
managed Iulius at BDG Imprest SRL

Write a recommendation for Iulius
Additional Information

Websites

* My Company
* My Company
* My Company

Interests

Aviation

Pilot Licence for ULM

3 years experience
Groups and Associations

* People in Prepaid
* ExBev
* Romania Business and Professional Network
* Prepaid | Analysis - Insight - Intelligence |
* On Startups - The Community For Entrepreneurs
* Corbeanca
* ! Sales Best Practices
cces la justitie, pauza, discriminari si provocari, da… Diplomele sterse, ceva trimiteri la munca de jos….
Buna coordonarea asta pe aici…
Si cred ca pana la urma cel care mi-a folosit actele, probabil sub protectia informativa a fostului socru, jud. Ctin. Furtuna, a fiicei lui, fosta mea sotie care nu vrea sa accepte prea usor divortul, Simona Furtuna, notar public, si cu concursul politistilor din Craiova, gen. col. Sandu, fostul sef 0215, cms. Bica, rectorul de la Drept Spiru Haret si a altilor, este Iulius Nistor, fratele unui ofiter de informatii militare, si probabil si el un acoperit in SPP…
Se joaca tare orice legaturi si “propuneri” de siguranta nationala, pentru a acoperi orice ancheta si a sterge urmele. Vad ca Tory canadieni, partenerii PDL-ului si SPP-ului in afacerile Tigareta I-IV, Bricheta, Valiza cu Bani, MetroRex Bombardier fac orice, totul posibil in a ma lichida in Toronto… Sper sa reusesc sa scap din “raiul” canadian, rai care-i adaposteste cu brio pe epileptici gen Florin Picu, “sursa” din Bechet, da identitati false unor surse gen Vasile Nita, si exceleaza in Romania in “unlawful police entry”, in “illegal internet interceptation – RomTelecom ADSL”, si mai ales in “post-fabricated evidence and charges”. Ce sa zici despre drepturile omului, cand este vorba de afaceri.

Poate ca Iulius Nistor este piesa de baza in comisionul pentru fregatele UK, poate ca stie atat de multe incat trebuie lichidate multe persoane, gen matusa mea Oprica Mateescu, trebuie “amputate” testicole, gen sotul ei, Bebe Mateescu, trebuie gazate persoane, gen Mishu Solea la Bailesti, se dau droguri fie de sinteza, fie pe instalatia de incalzire cu aer cald, ca in Calgary, mie, se produc accidente vasculare cerebrale si fracturi de sold, ca mamei mele. Pentru cine a vandut si de ce s-au acoperit actele pentru Nistor – sa fie trafic de armament, sau a fost cumva ceva infiltrare la EADS-Airbus???? Hamburg?

El a lucrat in echipa Katy Zanescu (colega oligarhului Ilinca din Craiova), protejata a fostului primar Vasile Bulucea… Pentru cine au lucrat, numai SRI si probabil ATF-CIA-ul pentru care lucreaza cms. Bica, si probabil MI6 sau Mossad-ul jud. Furtuna…

Dumnezeu cu mila pentru cei ca mine, victimele colaterale…

Sclavie moderna in Canada si Romania.... vai de mama lor de drepturile omului...

Se pare ca la paritate cu Ciprian Nastasiu, asa-zisul procuror independent, dar se pare ofiter de informatii care l-a anchetat pe Omar Hayssam, a cazut in Canada Michael Bryant, fost procuror sef in Ontario, ceva in genul asta, baiat in politica, viitor politician Tory. Cred ca echipa din Toronto, implicata in acoperirea jocurilor cu actele mele, date se pare colegului si prietenului Simonei Furtuna, Iulius Nistor, au fost sau au preluat Tory din Ontario, nu prea inteleg de ce totusi... Probabil prin Iulius s-au negociat sau platit ceva comisioane - poate s-a exportat si de la SNC Lavalin, urmare fiind ca directorul francofon al CSIS si-a dat demisia, ca acoperire...
Curios, s-au cumparat din Quebec codurile de procedura penala si civila, poate la "facilitarea" fostului meu socru, jud. Ctin. Furtuna, si prin Catalin Predoiu, var indepartat al lui Silviu Predoiu, directorul adj. SIE. Sa fie cei trei "un aspect" al comunitatii de informatii rrome, de care face atat caz Corneliu Vadim Tudor? Poate ca din cauza asta este greu de inregistrat chiar in Canada divortul meu, poate ca din cauza asta imi tot sunt "vanturate" si fluturate intimidari, sugestii de trecere in aborigen, de persoana cu dizabilitati, poate ca asa s-au fabricat acuzatii de siguranta nationala, de agresiune conjugala...
Canada isi bate joc de cetateni, a inceput sa fie o frauda, si urgent este de plecat din jocul lor de "cover-up".
Cred ca actele mele pentru Nistor au fost gestionate de Furtuna-Berceanu, si au participat oarecum la afacerile Tigareta I-IV. Nu inteleg de unde apare legatura cu Hong Kong-ul, dar este posibil ca jud. Furtuna sa fi facut protectia informativa si pentru dosarele Nastase, cu conexiunile lor chinezesti....
Din pacate, m-au prins la mijloc, m-au fabricat drept un "terorist" si sunt folosit pe post de momeala vie, live-bait, ca si alti detinuti Guantanamo, gen Maher Arar. Sunt lipsit de acces juridic, iar in rest, imi sunt aruncate pe toate ziarele gratis sugestii de HIV-SIDA. Posibil ca gen. Gordon Diamond, probabil initiatorul furtului de acte al meu, este cel care a pus la cale jocul. Sunt nevoit sa numar cel putin 3 politicieni tineri, care au iesit din joc, din cauza situatiei Bulacu-Nistor...
Initial am crezut ca Miron, fratele meu este folosit drept inlocuitor al meu, dar constat ca nu. Am crezut la un moment dat ca Valentin ?Lance?, actualul sot-prieten al fostei sotii este inlocuitorul meu, iar gasca SPP-SIE-PSD din jurul dr. Oprescu, fiul unui gen. DSS incearca sa rezolve cumva o izolare-detentie a mea, sub diverse pretexte sau mijloace, doar ca sa acopere un "rahat" major al gastii Iliescu, si "bavuri" ale serviciilor de informatii NATO, gen Madrid 3/11.
Aparent, prin jocul asta, se urmareste destabilizarea UE pentru SUA, ca o operatiune de informatii Foreign Flag, desfasurata de Canada-Israel-Romania. Aparent din cauza asta a ajuns echipa de ziaristi din Iraq in portbagaj, iar aici, in Toronto, se urmareste exact un "portbagaj" pentru mine. Cum au ajuns oare romanii sa faca jocurile astea de destabilizare pentru altii, ei fiind cei care vor lua rahatul, nu pot intelege. Cert este ca in acest moment, Canada nu mai este deloc ceea ce a fost, este o tara relativ periculoasa pentru intimitate, pentru cariera, ne-prielnica... Imi pare rau sa o spun, poate ca eu am de-a face de fapt doar cu un regim "micro" al CIA in Toronto, nu stiu precis. Poate ca este exact aceeasi situatie ca in Craiova, unde sub pretextul Ford se trag tunuri si se fac jocuri informative...
Este foarte posibil ca "account-ul" Mihai Bulacu sa fi fost cumva in portofoliul firmei IMP, din Halifax, de unde, coincidenta, actualul ministru canadian al apararii, Peter MacKay este. La Bombardier DSD l-am avut coleg pe fiul unui alt col. de la IMP, si poate ca nu a fost o coincidenta, ci era deja in contul "acte pentru Iulius Nistor, Chris Koening.
Sa fi facut canadienii Madrid 3/11, sa fi fost atat de nebuni incat sa marseze pe astfel de cretinisme?

In jocul asta, in Canada au incercat sa ma bage pe scenariul col. KGB-FSB Mihail Lenninkov, un individ care urmeaza sa fie deportat din Vancouver. Este o cacanarie canadiana ieftina, genul celei facute la Calgary, la Staples. Atunci au inceput cover-up-ul pentru Nistor-Madrid 3/11, pregatind lichidarea mea. Coincidenta, atunci a murit si Oprica Mateescu de o hemoragie gastrica, ca o intimidare generala, aviz amatorilor. Parca am mai auzit si despre ceva canceruri prin mediul politic, in Romania si Canada, dupa august 2007... Probabil exercitiile militare din Marea Neagra NATO din sept. 2007 au fost "umbrela" de lichidari, eliminari si intimidarea martorilor asupra Madrid 3/11 si actele Bulacu pt. Iulius Nistor...
Ma intreb daca intre jud. Furtuna, av. Victor Ciobanu si Adrian Goldenberg, operator de taxi la New York, confectioner de lenjerie in lohn in Romania exista vre-o legatura, sau este vorba doar despre o mica "coada" a WTC 9/11 2001. Grig Carstea, fostul meu coleg de facultate a fost in NY exact in 9/11 2001, iar Motorola shell al lui de atunci, l-am avut pentru o perioada si eu... Sa fie o coincidenta, sau este o operatiune informativa? In ce echipa e Furtuna? Victor Ciobanu este ofiter de informatii DSS, acum avocat...
Jud. Furtuna face un joc interesant, el pe stanga, iar cuscrul lui, Harzoiu, pe dreapta. Nu stiu daca Radu Berceanu este jucat de Furtuna sau de Harzoiu... Curios este insa jocul UK, de a ma impinge si neutraliza in sistemul de "Sifon" informativ, sau de security, minimalizare. Incep sa cred ca Nistor este implicat in comisioane UK, din moment ce sunt impins in jocuri englezesti. Poate ca asa as disparea mai usor din joc, as fi tinut la lichidare, cum sunt in Canada - fara suport juridic, lucrand 2 1/2 zile pe sapt., munca complet necalificata... Aviz amatorilor de emigrare in Toronto - nu sunt marfa serioasa astia de pe aici...

Curios, coincidenta, se pare ca Furtuna si gasca lui, ca in Moartea Dlui Lazarescu, ma foloseste ca pe un copil la cersit, un fel de martor si de carte de inchiriat, in diverse procese... Probabil gasca lui ia bani pentru prezenta mea in anumite jurisdictii juridice. Cred probabil ca


Se pare ca la paritate cu Ciprian Nastasiu, asa-zisul procuror independent, dar se pare ofiter de informatii care l-a anchetat pe Omar Hayssam, a cazut in Canada Michael Bryant, fost procuror sef in Ontario, ceva in genul asta, baiat in politica, viitor politician Tory. Cred ca echipa din Toronto, implicata in acoperirea jocurilor cu actele mele, date se pare colegului si prietenului Simonei Furtuna, Iulius Nistor, au fost sau au preluat Tory din Ontario, nu prea inteleg de ce totusi... Probabil prin Iulius s-au negociat sau platit ceva comisioane - poate s-a exportat si de la SNC Lavalin, urmare fiind ca directorul francofon al CSIS si-a dat demisia, ca acoperire...
Curios, s-au cumparat din Quebec codurile de procedura penala si civila, poate la "facilitarea" fostului meu socru, jud. Ctin. Furtuna, si prin Catalin Predoiu, var indepartat al lui Silviu Predoiu, directorul adj. SIE. Sa fie cei trei "un aspect" al comunitatii de informatii rrome, de care face atat caz Corneliu Vadim Tudor? Poate ca din cauza asta este greu de inregistrat chiar in Canada divortul meu, poate ca din cauza asta imi tot sunt "vanturate" si fluturate intimidari, sugestii de trecere in aborigen, de persoana cu dizabilitati, poate ca asa s-au fabricat acuzatii de siguranta nationala, de agresiune conjugala...
Canada isi bate joc de cetateni, a inceput sa fie o frauda, si urgent este de plecat din jocul lor de "cover-up".
Cred ca actele mele pentru Nistor au fost gestionate de Furtuna-Berceanu, si au participat oarecum la afacerile Tigareta I-IV. Nu inteleg de unde apare legatura cu Hong Kong-ul, dar este posibil ca jud. Furtuna sa fi facut protectia informativa si pentru dosarele Nastase, cu conexiunile lor chinezesti....
Din pacate, m-au prins la mijloc, m-au fabricat drept un "terorist" si sunt folosit pe post de momeala vie, live-bait, ca si alti detinuti Guantanamo, gen Maher Arar. Sunt lipsit de acces juridic, iar in rest, imi sunt aruncate pe toate ziarele gratis sugestii de HIV-SIDA. Posibil ca gen. Gordon Diamond, probabil initiatorul furtului de acte al meu, este cel care a pus la cale jocul. Sunt nevoit sa numar cel putin 3 politicieni tineri, care au iesit din joc, din cauza situatiei Bulacu-Nistor...
Initial am crezut ca Miron, fratele meu este folosit drept inlocuitor al meu, dar constat ca nu. Am crezut la un moment dat ca Valentin ?Lance?, actualul sot-prieten al fostei sotii este inlocuitorul meu, iar gasca SPP-SIE-PSD din jurul dr. Oprescu, fiul unui gen. DSS incearca sa rezolve cumva o izolare-detentie a mea, sub diverse pretexte sau mijloace, doar ca sa acopere un "rahat" major al gastii Iliescu, si "bavuri" ale serviciilor de informatii NATO, gen Madrid 3/11.
Aparent, prin jocul asta, se urmareste destabilizarea UE pentru SUA, ca o operatiune de informatii Foreign Flag, desfasurata de Canada-Israel-Romania. Aparent din cauza asta a ajuns echipa de ziaristi din Iraq in portbagaj, iar aici, in Toronto, se urmareste exact un "portbagaj" pentru mine. Cum au ajuns oare romanii sa faca jocurile astea de destabilizare pentru altii, ei fiind cei care vor lua rahatul, nu pot intelege. Cert este ca in acest moment, Canada nu mai este deloc ceea ce a fost, este o tara relativ periculoasa pentru intimitate, pentru cariera, ne-prielnica... Imi pare rau sa o spun, poate ca eu am de-a face de fapt doar cu un regim "micro" al CIA in Toronto, nu stiu precis. Poate ca este exact aceeasi situatie ca in Craiova, unde sub pretextul Ford se trag tunuri si se fac jocuri informative...
Este foarte posibil ca "account-ul" Mihai Bulacu sa fi fost cumva in portofoliul firmei IMP, din Halifax, de unde, coincidenta, actualul ministru canadian al apararii, Peter MacKay este. La Bombardier DSD l-am avut coleg pe fiul unui alt col. de la IMP, si poate ca nu a fost o coincidenta, ci era deja in contul "acte pentru Iulius Nistor, Chris Koening.
Sa fi facut canadienii Madrid 3/11, sa fi fost atat de nebuni incat sa marseze pe astfel de cretinisme?

In jocul asta, in Canada au incercat sa ma bage pe scenariul col. KGB-FSB Mihail Lenninkov, un individ care urmeaza sa fie deportat din Vancouver. Este o cacanarie canadiana ieftina, genul celei facute la Calgary, la Staples. Atunci au inceput cover-up-ul pentru Nistor-Madrid 3/11, pregatind lichidarea mea. Coincidenta, atunci a murit si Oprica Mateescu de o hemoragie gastrica, ca o intimidare generala, aviz amatorilor. Parca am mai auzit si despre ceva canceruri prin mediul politic, in Romania si Canada, dupa august 2007... Probabil exercitiile militare din Marea Neagra NATO din sept. 2007 au fost "umbrela" de lichidari, eliminari si intimidarea martorilor asupra Madrid 3/11 si actele Bulacu pt. Iulius Nistor...
Ma intreb daca intre jud. Furtuna, av. Victor Ciobanu si Adrian Goldenberg, operator de taxi la New York, confectioner de lenjerie in lohn in Romania exista vre-o legatura, sau este vorba doar despre o mica "coada" a WTC 9/11 2001. Grig Carstea, fostul meu coleg de facultate a fost in NY exact in 9/11 2001, iar Motorola shell al lui de atunci, l-am avut pentru o perioada si eu... Sa fie o coincidenta, sau este o operatiune informativa? In ce echipa e Furtuna? Victor Ciobanu este ofiter de informatii DSS, acum avocat...
Jud. Furtuna face un joc interesant, el pe stanga, iar cuscrul lui, Harzoiu, pe dreapta. Nu stiu daca Radu Berceanu este jucat de Furtuna sau de Harzoiu... Curios este insa jocul UK, de a ma impinge si neutraliza in sistemul de "Sifon" informativ, sau de security, minimalizare. Incep sa cred ca Nistor este implicat in comisioane UK, din moment ce sunt impins in jocuri englezesti. Poate ca asa as disparea mai usor din joc, as fi tinut la lichidare, cum sunt in Canada - fara suport juridic, lucrand 2 1/2 zile pe sapt., munca complet necalificata... Aviz amatorilor de emigrare in Toronto - nu sunt marfa serioasa astia de pe aici...

Curios, coincidenta, se pare ca Furtuna si gasca lui, ca in Moartea Dlui Lazarescu, ma foloseste ca pe un copil la cersit, un fel de martor si de carte de inchiriat, in diverse procese... Probabil gasca lui ia bani pentru prezenta mea in anumite jurisdictii juridice. Cred probabil ca
sunt carte de presiune in anumite procese in derulare, desi nu am datele necesare:
Proces Pfizer - 2.3Bln. $
Proces Microsoft - anti-trust
Airbus deal - vs. USA (WTA)
deci sunt pe post de sclav la niste proxeneti de cea mai joasa factura... Urmasii operatorilor de sclavi din sec. 18-19...
Cred ca trebuie sa intru intr-o jurisdictie mai morala, nu atat de duplicitara, cum sunt anglo-saxonii. Parca nemtii, italienii si elvetienii nu au fost traficanti de sclavi si de droguri, ca englezii, si Commonwealth-ul lor.... Vai de mama ei de ipocrizie canadiana si engleza. Americanii macar au un presedinte de culoare, care accepta ca stare de fapt coruptia si disfunctionalitatea din Romania, si mai si profita...